Why must the white cis nonprofit workers angry react to all my posts? Ep: “That’s just the way it is”

Why must the white cis nonprofit workers angry react to all my posts? Ep: “That’s just the way it is”

By Chris Talbot, communications professional and educomics creator

Go back to the infographic via this link

First section introduction

Apologies if you’ve heard this one before: imagine me — a queer, trans, triracial person — in a Zoom meeting with an all-white, all-cis Development Committee. A proposal for a pay-to-play fundraising scheme (a fundraiser that requires donors to pay to engage in an activity, in this case: an educational event) is on the table and I mention the equity issues of who can access this and how it doesn’t advance the mission…

First section

The first section shows a portion of a Zoom meeting screen, with one Zoom box, labeled “Chris (they/them).” There’s an illustration of myself in the box against a green background. I’m saying “That’s not an equitable practice and would lead to only our wealthy donors getting information that should be readily shared with anyone who wants to learn it. Some of the people who collected the data that informed our research wouldn’t be included in that group.” Next to that Zoom box is a partial, showing a white woman. The name label says “white cis woman” and her Zoom box is yellow.

In the next cell, I’m saying “The history of wealth in this nation and who has had access would also cause a racial disparity because — ” I’m cut off by the white cis woman laughing in the next cell. In the next, I’ve closed my mouth tightly and tilted my head and my Zoom box is now yellow.

In the next cell, the white cis woman is smiling with her hands up in a dismissive gesture saying “That’s just how fundraising is. That’s how it works.” Text says “Without thinking, I responded.” In the next cell my Zoom box is now red, I’m angry and saying “Well, it’s a practice steeped in white supremacy culture.”

The next cell shows the full Zoom room. Everyone is either labeled “white cis woman” or “white cis man” against a yellow or red background. Those with red have the Facebook angry react emoji replacing their faces. Those in yellow have the Facebook wow react emoji replacing their faces.

Second section introduction

In another meeting, I brought up the equity concerns I (and the rest of the staff) had with allowing negotiations of salary. Something we had talked about thoroughly as a staff and all agreed brought in too many inequities…

Second section

The second section shows a portion of a Zoom meeting screen, with one Zoom box, labeled “Chris (they/them).” There’s an illustration of myself in the box against a green background. I’m saying “As a staff, we’ve decided not to invite negotiation. Studies show that candidates with relative privilege are aware of and will negotiate, whereas candidates from marginalized communities are less likely to even know negotiation is a thing. I didn’t know until I was about 35. Additionally, pay equity is something we can operationalize right away.” Next to that Zoom box is a partial, showing a white man. The name label says “white cis man” and his Zoom box is yellow.

In the next cell, I’m saying “The salary is in line with the rest of the staff’s compensation.” In the next cell, the white cis man’s Zoom box is now red. He’s waving a finger and a label indicates he’s giving an “aggressive loud lecture.” In the next, I’ve closed my mouth tightly and tilted my head and my Zoom box is now yellow.

In the next cell, the white cis man is still against a red background. He is saying “At the end of the day, we’re a business. And this is how business is.” Text says “I didn’t see the point in responding, so I turned my camera off and stop giving my wisdom. If my expertise wasn’t valued, they could stare at my Zoom icon and feel my absence.” In the next cell, my Zoom box is black with my Zoom icon, which is a portrait of myself.

Conclusion

What does it even mean that something is “Just the way it is?”

An illustration shows sprouted stalks of corn. A garden label says “Organic Fundraising Techniques.”

Text says “Fundraising techniques or business practices aren’t like corn. They aren’t what nature gives when we plant certain seeds. They have been developed over the course of decades to be what they are. And, as with everything else in our society, they are often steeped in white supremacy culture.

“The good news is that because they aren’t natural or immutable, we can notice that something is inequitable, talk about it, and change it to something that is as accessible to everyone as we can imagine. And, when we learn that it is still inaccessible to some, we can change it again.

“But first, we need to stop reacting angrily when someone points out inequities in the way it’s been done historically and realize that just because we’ve always done it that way doesn’t mean we have to or that a better path isn’t possible.”

The next cell shows the full Zoom room. Everyone is either labeled “white cis woman” or “white cis man” against a green background. In the Zoom room, I say “That’s not an equitable practice.” The white cis woman from before, instead of laughing, says “I didn’t realize that. Can you say more?” Everyone else on the Zoom call has the LinkedIn curious react emoji replacing their faces.

Chris Talbot

Chris Talbot

Chris Talbot (they/them) is a queer, trans nonbinary, mixed-race artist, activist, and nonprofit employee. When they aren’t working the day job, they spend their free time editing art and literature magazines, writing and illustrating educomics to help folks affirm their nonbinary pals, creating a graphic novel to describe what it’s like to be nonbinary in a gender binary world, cuddling their cat, and quad skating in the park. 

You can find Chris at talbot-heindl.com, on LinkedIn, Instagram, Bluesky, and Twitter — and tip them on Venmo or PayPal or join as a patron on their Patreon

The Drizzle: Three Mistakes I’ve Made As a Fundraiser

The Drizzle: Three Mistakes I’ve Made As a Fundraiser

By Michelle Shireen Muri, Freedom Conspiracy Principal and CCF co-chair

Episode Summary

In the second episode of the Drizzle Miniseries, The Ethical Rainmaker host Michelle shares the three biggest mistakes she made as an in-house fundraiser, including themes on event extortion, process predicaments, and burn out blessings.

About the Ethical Rainmaker podcast

In the United States alone, philanthropy is a $427 million dollar industry, of which 68% comes from individual donors. Yet the practices, theories, and foundation of modern philanthropy and fundraising often ignore the ways in which the industry perpetuates harm.

The Ethical Rainmaker, hosted by Michelle Shireen Muri, is a podcast that hosts authentic conversations grappling with the questions that we don’t often ask in the nonprofit world. Join us as we explore some of the practices that undermine our missions and navigate the way forward with today’s resisters, reimaginers, and the re-creators of the third sector. It’s time to think differently.

Michelle Shireen Muri

Michelle Shireen Muri

Michelle Shireen Muri (she/her) is the co-chair of the founding Seattle chapter for Community-Centric Fundraising and the host of the podcast, The Ethical Rainmaker. She is the founder of Freedom Conspiracy, a small collective of fundraising consultants focused on bringing values-aligned practices to clients in the nonprofit and philanthropy spaces. She can be reached at @freedomconspiracy on Instagram. You can send her a tip via Patreon.

The Drizzle: How I Got Into Fundraising

The Drizzle: How I Got Into Fundraising

By Michelle Shireen Muri, Freedom Conspiracy Principal and CCF co-chair

Episode Summary

In this inaugural episode of the Drizzle miniseries, the Ethical Rainmaker host Michelle shares her origin story, (with chapters that include bullying, Classical music, the CIA, fate, therapy, and more!)

About the Ethical Rainmaker podcast

In the United States alone, philanthropy is a $427 million dollar industry, of which 68% comes from individual donors. Yet the practices, theories, and foundation of modern philanthropy and fundraising often ignore the ways in which the industry perpetuates harm.

The Ethical Rainmaker, hosted by Michelle Shireen Muri, is a podcast that hosts authentic conversations grappling with the questions that we don’t often ask in the nonprofit world. Join us as we explore some of the practices that undermine our missions and navigate the way forward with today’s resisters, reimaginers, and the re-creators of the third sector. It’s time to think differently.

Michelle Shireen Muri

Michelle Shireen Muri

Michelle Shireen Muri (she/her) is the co-chair of the founding Seattle chapter for Community-Centric Fundraising and the host of the podcast, The Ethical Rainmaker. She is the founder of Freedom Conspiracy, a small collective of fundraising consultants focused on bringing values-aligned practices to clients in the nonprofit and philanthropy spaces. She can be reached at @freedomconspiracy on Instagram. You can send her a tip via Patreon.

Our Humanity Can’t Be Timeblocked

Our Humanity Can’t Be Timeblocked

By: Phoebe Zinman, Operations and Communications Manager at Kazanas Development Strategies

Nonprofit PTSD is real. But people can be convinced to take a walk or do something with their family. The pleasure of having more time grows on you…

At the end of 2021, the company I work for (Kazanas Development Strategies) completed a massive migration of data, documented our operations process, and provided employees with new hardware. After months of planning and research, we also instituted a 4-day workweek, honor-system paid time off (PTO), and other policies designed to create a sustainable and attractive work environment.

Many companies and organizations have recognized that a 4-day workweek is a great idea but haven’t actually done it yet. When researching the concept, I felt as if there was a dearth of practical, logistical information about how companies can transition. I decided to journal about how the new policies were affecting my workflow and to track what happens when the rubber meets the road.  

First of all, let it be known that there are folks for whom the exploitative nonprofit work environment is so ingrained that they would sooner drink decaf than take Friday off completely. Nonprofit PTSD is real. But people can be convinced to take a walk or do something with their family. The pleasure of having more time grows on you (even if it’s never sufficient to do all the things that life requires).

Each week in January, I spent my Mondays and Tuesdays feeling stressed that there was no way for it to all get done, and then had a meltdown on Wednesdays. [In the spirit of transparency, I am prone to a meltdown on Wednesdays.] Then, suddenly, it was Thursday at 5 pm, and everything was done! I grew more confident; I worked hard, I focused, and I filled gaps of time with tasks instead of spinning my wheels or scrolling TikTok. It was feeling good. 

But like any good striving white woman in Operations in the nonprofit industrial complex during late-stage capitalism, I thought, this could get even better. This could get even more efficient. I wanted to figure out how to manage time in the best, most perfect way. I wanted color coding and reminders and benchmarks. 

My new system worked great, until it didn’t. And despite my passionate embrace of calendar blocking and efficiency, the wheels came off pretty quickly.  

1/13/2022
Dear Diary,

It feels bananas that the week is already over and we have a 4-day weekend because Monday is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. We got a big snowstorm last Friday so instead of our well-laid plans to enjoy our first Friday off, we were all shoveling or taking kids out in the snow. One of us went to happy hour, everyone else was watching movies or binge-watching Station Eleven (so, so good).

I watched a couple of YouTube videos on calendar blocking and color coding, and it really appeals to my visual- processing mind. Of course, Christina’s calendar is cuter, but she’s been doing this longer. I shared it out on Teams and said we would go over it at the next Professional Development.

1/20/2022
Dear Diary,

On Tuesday, I asked coworkers what they did with their Friday off, but no one responded on Teams. I grudgingly admit that I am the most [only] excited person to document this experiment.

This week already felt short because of the Monday and Friday off but today, Thursday, we’re all juggling kids home from another snow day as well. January is actually a difficult month to try out new things, despite our society assigning “newness” to it; there are holidays and snow days, and holiday recovery, and every week seems a little wonky.

I couldn’t adhere to my calendar blocking AT ALL. Not sure if that’s a reflection of my having ineptly assigned myself tasks at times that aren’t suited to focusing on them, or if it’s because it’s a new system and I’m still used to just ping-ponging from task to task.

Pursuing pleasure is a radical act. Embracing unpredictability is revolutionary.

Fortunately, it didn’t take long to arrive at the realization that all methods for time management are insidiously and inherently ableist and capitalist. This was another discipline that made me feel bad all the time, another system that I couldn’t participate in or see myself represented in because my brain, my home life, and my physical health were uncooperative. And I recognize that I have myriad advantages in being white, femme, and a native English speaker with access to Medicaid. I am able and resourced in so many conventional, visible ways. Additional racial inequities and systemic burdens would likely be insurmountable barriers. I might not have even been able to fill out all the forms.

3/1/2022
Dear Diary,

Timeboxing, calendar blocking, time boxing, time blocking — they all rely on the assumption that one shows up with predictable capacity every day. In the beginning, I thought, “I’ll write in the mornings, and I’ll be more up for Admin tasks on Mondays and Thursdays; Operations and Data feels like a Wednesday thing,” etc…

Here’s what I didn’t take into account: I’m a single mom living in a state where there’s snow, and therefore snow days. I have invisible physical and mental health conditions, and chronic pain. I don’t sleep consistently. In any given week, I’m embroiled in phone tag with insurance companies and doctor’s offices or I need to be at a First Grade Animal Expo, a Fifth Grade Concert, or a library board meeting.  Every week, every day, every part of a day can be unpredictable.

Unpredictability is feral, is anti-capitalist, is disabled, and is not color-codable on an Outlook Calendar. In fact, when I tried to calendar block my work week, what became most clear is how good I am at my job in spite of all these challenges because of my considerable personal advantages, and that my skills flourish because professionally I am privileged to work for a company with a culture that nurtures my intuition, playfulness, and an organic workflow. 

Anyway, Diary, today I was feeling pretty uncreative and low energy, and I needed to zone out; instead of forcing myself to work on creating content or solving a tricky operations issue, I worked on entering data and scouring our databases. For six hours. Even though it’s Tuesday, and not Wednesday.

So how does one implement a 4-day workweek without fortifying the systems you are trying to disrupt? Nearly all the folks I connected with about adopting a 4-day workweek from other organizations or small consulting companies (many through CCF’s Slack) were interested in figuring out how to actually get everything done by Thursday. How can we be more efficient in those four days?  

The response I have developed: 

  • Focus on being effective, not efficient
  • Benchmark goals for the month, not the week. 
  • Provide surveys at month’s-end to gauge how the shorter work week impacts stress and deadlines. 
  • Adopt the most inclusive, progressive, stringent criteria that considers ability, accessibility, and systemic stressors when vetting methods and practices for workflow. 

And finally, please remember that time is a construct. Pursuing pleasure is a radical act. Embracing unpredictability is revolutionary.

Phoebe Zinman

Phoebe Zinman

Phoebe Zinman (she/her) is a writer and nonprofit professional who has worn almost every nonprofit hat you can think of as an intern, volunteer, teaching artist, service provider, program administrator, event planner, and assistant development director. She worked for years doing social justice and community art-making in Philly, Boston, and NYC at museums, schools, residential facilities, rehabs, universities, and arts councils before moving to advance reproductive justice. Her current position at KDS draws upon all these experiences as she works to create internal change in the nonprofit industry. She lives in New York’s Hudson Valley where she serves on her library board and volunteers for local LGBTQIA+ organizations and county elections.  She loves cats and is on hiatus from social media but can be found on LinkedIn.

It’s time to stop coddling our donors: how radical transparency makes us stronger

It’s time to stop coddling our donors: how radical transparency makes us stronger

By Yolie Contreras (she/her), fledging fundraiser and Zinester

Our work compliments the already existing efforts of those who are being marginalized.

First and foremost, I work for the community, not donors.

This statement tends to shock people because I usually start with this before saying I am a fundraiser. But how do you not center the donor? I get asked this constantly.

It’s easy because I don’t view myself or donors as saviors. Our work compliments the already existing efforts of those who are being marginalized. It can be hard to come to terms with this as a nonprofit employee and as a donor. 

I also believe that donations shouldn’t come with strings attached. The concept of “giving” is completely negated when a donor is expecting something in return beyond the normal mission of an organization. This can show up as entitlement to staff and volunteers’ time, feeling that their voices should be listened to based on the amount of money they have given, etc. As such, we tend to bend and change our message to suit these donors because we want their “gifts” of support. Well, I’m here to say that I am not doing that anymore.

The harsh realities of our work should not exist in a vacuum. When we fundraise or talk about our work, we tend to romanticize our efforts. Depending on the work that is being done, we use phrases like: “Life-saving,” “charity,” and “life-changing,” etc. While I’m not diminishing that the work we do is important, I think it’s equally important to let our donors know that this work is HARD. There’s nothing really glamorous about filling a gigantic hole that the government and society at large have created. Working for those that are being marginalized takes resiliency and strength. It also means that we, as fundraisers, have to filter the terrible realities of this work to our donors.

And so it goes when actively engaging with our donors. There is an invisible push to gloss over harsh statistics and harm the communities we serve are actively facing. We are encouraged to do this in order to make our work palatable for the masses. This in turn, usually means people will only receive surface-level information that turns into money for our organization. 

Being honest and truthful about the realities that we work in can only strengthen our connection to our supporters.

Why is this the norm? Why don’t we trust that our donors want to hear the truth about what it takes to make movements run? Watering down our mission and work is doing a disservice to our donors and us, in addition to being deeply seated in white saviorism. Being honest and truthful about the realities that we work in can only strengthen our connection to our supporters.

That means being radically transparent with our donors and shining a light on how the harmful culture of white supremacy, capitalism, and US imperialism affects so many aspects of our lives and work. This shit is systemic and is not going away anytime soon. Let’s be clear, it’s not easy and you will get a lot of pushback. But, let me tell you, for every donor that leaves in huff, 10 more will take their place. When the community at large sees that you are staying true to your values and mission, they will embrace you. And do we really want to accept money from people who perpetuate harm by refusing to look beyond the surface?

For example, when I started at my current organization, there was a lot of coddling happening with our donors. Most of whom were white and wealthy, with Boomers providing 43% of all donations. I wanted to shift this practice and start speaking on how white supremacy has contributed to dangerous and harmful border policies affecting migrants every day. I was told no, that it would affect our donations and alienate our supporters.

How is being truthful and honest about this work seen as a detriment to our cause? I’m sure you have heard this time and again. Slowly but surely, I changed that narrative to fully embrace abolition, mutual aid, and CCF principles. And you know what? Our donations have not suffered. Shocking right?

I will say that it’s not all hate. I have received so much support and validation that we’re heading in the right direction.

Have I received a lot of hate mail from our so-called supporters and donors? Hell yes, and I say good riddance. We will never create change if we don’t have these tough conversations. I honestly feel like donors should be grateful that we are taking the time to educate them and bringing them into the inner workings of our world. Especially when BIPOC fundraisers are the ones taking our time to educate these donors. It’s truly a gift.

I will say that it’s not all hate. I have received so much support and validation that we’re heading in the right direction. It’s incredibly affirming to be in community with people who care about the good and bad parts of our work. You can expand on this radical transparency to go beyond donors by weaving it into your organization as a whole. Let volunteers and donors know how hard it can be to fundraise, write appeals and create various communication. Let your supporters know that your organization is not the only one doing this work. Embrace your community and allied organizations by sharing their calls for support. Use your platform for this purpose. No subscribing to resource hoarding or a scarcity mindset here!

We don’t live in a candy-coated world and nonprofits need to stop pretending as such. Because the old ways of the past are no longer working (did they ever?). Changing and transforming this culture will be difficult but well worth it. Educating your donors by removing flowery wording is a small step towards a larger and more transparent world.

Yolie Contreras

Yolie Contreras

Yolie Contreras (she/her) is a Salvi-Chicanx writer, fundraiser and neurodivergent babe. She believes that words and actions matter, and as long as systems of oppression exist, it is our duty to dismantle them. When she’s not working, Yolie spends her time writing zines about depression, anxiety and OCD. She currently lives in Tucson, AZ with her husband Billy and their cats named Ricky and Fred. Find her on Instagram @Yolie4u. Send her a tip via her Venmo, Yolie4u.