No more silence: Suicide and nonprofit staff

No more silence: Suicide and nonprofit staff

By Mary Cianflone, Development Manager at Pegasus Legal Services for Children

CW: This essay deals with trauma, nonprofit jobs dealing with violence and abuse, suicidal ideation, death by suicide, and the trauma from surviving a friend or coworker’s fatal suicide, and may be triggering to some readers. Please proceed with caution. If you need immediate assistance, please follow this link to International Suicide Hotlines

(Names and identifying details have been altered to protect the privacy of the people involved.)

Several years ago, I took a break from fundraising to do frontline work at a “high-trauma” non-profit organization. By “high trauma,” I mean that we provided direct services to our community and often interfaced with injured, ailing, dying, or even deceased members of this community. 

It was an incredibly intense job. Emotions ran high. Tears and yelling were not uncommon among clients and staff. 

Like many non-profit jobs, the pay was low, and the shifts were long. Most of my co-workers had second jobs because we made so little there. The work was also physically demanding. We were on our feet for hours, often needing to lift heavy loads and jog or run. The job was both horrific and rewarding, depending on the day. Sometimes, it was both in one day.  

So, why did I work there? Why did any of us? 

Because of the mission. Because the losses were catastrophic, but the wins were monumental. On the good days, we changed lives for the better. I still have photos pinned to the bulletin board of my home office to remember the people I met and the work I did there. 

The staff developed deep bonds, something akin to friendship but heavier. Even when we fought, we were allies. Even when we disliked each other, we stood together. It was more than just the experiences on the job. It was also the fact that we couldn’t share our experiences with anyone but each other. My partner would ask, How was your day? and I had to quickly scan my mind for the safest stories to share, actively filtering the full truth so as not to traumatize them. In many ways, all we had was each other. No one fully understood the pain we went through. 

The loss of my coworker Paula to suicide

So when one of my closest work friends, Paula, left the organization abruptly, I was concerned. It was a particularly stressful time among staff, and several of us were in conflict. Paula had also recently experienced hardships in her personal life. Her departure was shocking. She was a long-time employee and known as a peacemaker among the staff. Many of us counted on her experience to help settle arguments and maintain perspective. I worried about what was happening in her world that would cause her to leave a job she loved. Something felt wrong. 

When I got the call that she had died, I felt like I had known it was coming. I didn’t need to hear the next words because I already knew in my heart it was suicide. I had suspicions about her passing – that her personal struggles and the loss of her work contributed to her emotional state and, ultimately, her death. A few days later, I received a letter from her in the mail. Confirmation of my suspicions offered no comfort. I just had a piece of paper and a hole in my heart.

After a few weeks of grieving, I began to turn over the events surrounding Paula’s death in a new way. 

I have been in the grant-writing and fundraising world for over 15 years. My mind automatically reaches for data when I need context. I am used to seeking answers to questions like: What are the numbers surrounding this problem?, What societal factors cause this particular conflict?, Are there other people with similar stories?, and What are the solutions? My pain fueled a search for knowledge, in the hopes of learning how I and others in my situation could heal.

The lack of data when it comes to nonprofit workers who die by suicide

there is so little known (and few places to learn) about the people working in our field and how this work impacts their lives. There are also few protections for the staff putting themselves in physical, mental, and emotional harm every day. 

Seeking general data on suicide quickly became a bitter journey. Facts are fuzzy, and the difficulties begin with sourcing initial information. We simply don’t always know when a death is a suicide. Surviving family and friends have the choice to hold back information about their loved one’s death. The pain of suicide radiates through a community. Many make the choice to keep details private for their own preservation and for fear of causing more pain. Facts on suicide among nonprofit staff are almost non-existent.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks suicide rates for a variety of industries. Their most recent study from 2020 identifies certain labor types, like “Transportation,” as having higher than average rates of suicide for males and females (non-binary and gender fluid individuals were not tracked). The study, and other governmental research projects like the Census, use the list of occupations from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

However, nonprofits are not considered their own occupation or industry. Rather, the type of work, like “Healthcare Support,” is what gets categorized. For example, relevant to nonprofits, there are listings for “Fundraisers” and “Social Workers.” One reason for this is because nonprofits are, at their most basic definition, businesses operating under a particular set of tax codes. Nonprofits are ultimately accountable to groups that oversee all businesses in this country, like OSHA and the IRS. 

But, then, there is a sort of administrative void. Other fields have things like certifying boards and unions that protect and advocate for their workers. Nonprofit staff have many optional organizations we can choose to join, but nothing in the way of broader oversight. The governing landscape freefalls from the federal level until we land on the individual Board of Directors for each nonprofit.

Groups like the Lilly School of Philanthropy at Indiana University, the Library of Congress, the National Council of Nonprofits, and Independent Sector, among many others, offer piecemeal data and research on topics like starting a nonprofit, donor patterns, and employee retention. The information they provide can be valuable in many ways, especially when sourced from individuals currently working in the field. 

However, a significant portion of their research focuses on nonprofit organizational health and growth: how to keep employees on staff longer, increase donor gifts, and advocate for our missions. I in no way mean to diminish the importance of these efforts. My point is that there is so little known (and few places to learn) about the people working in our field and how this work impacts their lives. There are also few protections for the staff putting themselves in physical, mental, and emotional harm every day. 

The lack of support services nonprofit workers often face

There is something oddly cyclical about experiencing trauma, starting a nonprofit to mitigate trauma, and asking people to work at a nonprofit exposing them to trauma.

People turn to nonprofits in moments of crisis. Often, we are the ones that help them navigate obtuse government assistance programs, disaster relief, and confusing legal protocols. We feed, care for, and bolster our community. 

When trauma or tragedy occurs, we turn to nonprofits in other ways, too. For example, in seeking answers on nonprofit employees and suicide, much of what I found was information on people starting a nonprofit after a loved one’s suicide. The inclination for many is to help people heal via a nonprofit. 

But how does the work affect the workers? There is something oddly cyclical about experiencing trauma, starting a nonprofit to mitigate trauma, and asking people to work at a nonprofit exposing them to trauma.

I struggled to find data on overall suicides among nonprofit staff. Here is what I know anecdotally: I have personally experienced three coworker suicides. Paula’s was simply the one that cut deepest and closest. 

As I started to share this story with other nonprofit workers, they said they, too have lost at least one coworker to suicide. We also know that rates of suicides, in general, are rising. The 2022 article “‘It’s all preventable’: tackling America’s workplace suicide epidemic,” details multiple examples of frontline workers dying by suicide in the face of trauma and exhaustion from their jobs. A large portion of nonprofit staff would absolutely fall into the category of “frontline workers.” 

Paula and I were part of an organization that often dealt with victims of violence and abuse. Program staff had little support from management. There were no functioning mental health services outside of what insurance provided (and nothing for part-time staff). Requests for time off were often denied because of being short-staffed. On paper, our shifts were 9 hours long with an hour lunch break, but, in reality, my days were typically around 10 hours with shortened lunch breaks. During a crisis, 12-hour days were not uncommon. 

When staff pushed back and asked for better working conditions, management often weaponized the mission. We were told that any additional benefits we received would cut into the budget for client services. 

When Paula died, no grief services were offered to staff. The explanation was that since she had quit and was no longer an employee, services were unnecessary. She had been at the organization for over 10 years.

My healing journey and how I came back to nonprofit work with a new commitment to unpacking trauma

When I saw people in my field starting to open up and discuss the pain, violence, and trauma embedded in our work, my grief shifted. It still lives with me, but its weight feels more distributed, more even somehow. It feels like something I carry with me instead of dragging me down. 

I was privileged in my grief. I had a compassionate partner who made enough money to care for me when I couldn’t work after Paula’s suicide. I spent six weeks or so in bed, deeply depressed and barely able to take care of my personal hygiene, let alone contribute to our household needs or get a new job. One of my dogs never left my side and spent much of his time with his paw or head resting on my legs. 

I re-read her letter over and over again. I cried more than I thought possible. I blamed everyone for Paula’s death, including myself. I vowed never to work at another nonprofit. I would find a corporate job where I didn’t care about any of my coworkers or clients. I would never hurt like this again. 

The darkest moments for me were the ones in which I realized I missed my job. I missed the eye rolls and laughter with my coworkers, the smiles on my clients’ faces when we solved a problem together, and the feeling that what I did mattered. Things were messy, hard, and difficult when I started my day; and when I ended it, things were better, even if only for a few people. I missed conversations with Paula. I learned so much from her.  

I started looking for jobs in the private sector. Don’t care, don’t care, don’t care, I kept chanting to myself. I was hired, left, and hired somewhere else – miserable at each new place. The jobs felt so empty. I slowly (and angrily) realized that I couldn’t just switch off the part of me that connected with my former work. So, I very carefully chose a nonprofit and jumped back in. 

I have held the story of Paula’s death close to me, sharing only with a few close friends. I was scared of the weight of it. The people I told would shake their heads or cry. I felt like I was traumatizing them by reaching out. This only made me feel lonelier and more isolated in my grief. Then, things shifted in 2020. 

Like many white women, I began my anti-racist journey and started to learn about martyrdom and “white women’s tears.” I started unpacking my own racism and how I centered myself in much of my nonprofit work. 

I stumbled across Vu Le’s blog, and read his piece on suicide and nonprofits. He called on us to actively talk about suicide, helping to release the stigma of it. I agreed with him empathetically, but also, I didn’t know how. 

I believe that my anti-racist journey helped me find the tools to unpack trauma that I experienced and inflicted, as well as how to talk about it in ways that would minimize pain to others. Forums like the CCF Hub have become places of discussion and healing. Things feel like they are finally changing for our sector.

Fundraisers are in a unique position to facilitate hard conversations. We are storytellers, used to immersing ourselves in complicated conflicts, absorbing all the details, then transforming them for others to learn. We possess huge amounts of information about our organization’s mission and work, as well as massive amounts of data on surrounding issues. We are able to drill down to the smallest detail and also speak about the expansive benefits of our work over time. Big picture or small, we know how to talk to people about difficult topics. We guide our communities to hope.

I have brought up several problems and questions here without offering many solutions. For me, just starting to discuss these topics is an important step. Did Paula lose her life to suicide because she worked at a nonprofit? No, of course not. Did the repeated trauma of her work affect her? Yes, absolutely. 

None of these issues are that simple. But we have to continue talking about them. 

When I saw people in my field starting to open up and discuss the pain, violence, and trauma embedded in our work, my grief shifted. It still lives with me, but its weight feels more distributed, more even somehow. It feels like something I carry with me instead of dragging me down. 

Maybe that is the magic of community. We can share pieces of our pain and learn from them together. 

The first step toward justice is naming injustice. It’s okay that I (we) don’t have all the answers yet. We can figure them out together. 

For me, the journey feels less scary now that I am not alone. Thank you for letting me share.

Mary Cianflone

Mary Cianflone

Mary Cianflone (she/her/hers) is the Development Manager at Pegasus Legal Services for Children. She has over 15 years of experience with grants management, development, fundraising, and finance. After supporting a variety of student-focused initiatives at the University of New Mexico, she began working with the local Albuquerque non-profit community in 2016. Besides being a fundraiser, she is a digital artist, dog parent, and aspiring chef. You can connect with Mary on LinkedIn.

What charity runs can accomplish: Why I’m running 26 miles alongside my dad to support a suicide helpline

What charity runs can accomplish: Why I’m running 26 miles alongside my dad to support a suicide helpline

By Isabella Lock, a freelance journalist with an interest in mental health and cultural identity

CW: This essay deals with death by suicide and the trauma from surviving a loved one’s fatal suicide, which may be triggering to some readers. Please proceed with caution. If you need immediate assistance, please follow this link to International Suicide Hotlines. If you are in the UK or the Republic of Ireland, you can contact the Samaritans mentioned in this essay 24/7 via phone call (116 123), email (jo@samaritans.org), letter (Freepost SAMARITANS LETTERS), or use their self-help app.

Dave wearing a telephone costume with Samaritans written across the top

While I cannot go back in time and change the past, I can help to prevent this terrible loss from happening to others. If running the marathon saves just one life, then it would have been more than worth it.

For as long as I can remember, my dad has been running marathons dressed as Dave the Running Telephone for the Samaritans. This UK-based charity works to ensure that fewer people die by suicide by reducing the risk factors that make some people more likely to take their lives, ensuring that people who are at increased risk of suicide are supported, making it less likely that people who do experience suicidal thoughts act on them, and reducing the likelihood that people will develop suicidal thoughts.

As the 2024 TCS London Marathon Charity of the Year, the Samaritans aims to raise £1.7 million to maintain their mental health services.

In the past year, I increasingly wondered where it all began – my dad’s marathon obsession. He explained that he always had a passion for running. He soon became addicted to the camaraderie among like-minded people, the cheering crowds, and the emotional roller-coaster of marathons. 

Having supported my dad at every London Marathon, I can absolutely confirm that there is a sort of magic in the air. I know that no matter the weather or one’s mood, the London Marathon is always a day full of joy and love for both participants and spectators. 

As for the choice of charity, my dad tells me that it goes back to when he reached out to the Samaritans in his own times of despair. 

They listened without judgement and helped my father feel a little less alone. It was then that he realised the power of listening and chose to become a helpline volunteer himself. He became increasingly passionate about their work and aspired to make as many people aware of the Samaritans as possible. 

And so he got creative. He merged his two passions, running and the Samaritans, to produce “Dave the Running Telephone.”  By running marathons in a life-sized green telephone, my dad became an iconic mascot associated with the Samaritans and, in turn, created a huge profile for the charity.

On the streets, the telephone captures the attention of all and allows my dad to speak one-on-one with gathered spectators. Every year someone pulls my dad to the side and tells him how they have battled with suicide or lost someone from it. My dad always offers support and a shoulder to cry on. In doing so, my father creates an image of the Samaritans as a group of real people wanting to help people feel a little less alone in their hardships.  

My dad has also spoken every year on the radio with Eddie Nester about his charity work for over four years. The uniqueness of my father’s telephone costume marathons hooks listeners in and spreads awareness of suicide prevention.

A white board with a lap tally leans against a brick wall.

My dad has maintained his annual tradition of running the London Marathon in costume for 24 years. Even during the pandemic. But instead of the bustling streets of the city, he took to our garden patio and ran back and forth a whopping 2,175 times.

I have profound respect for my father, and to run alongside him has always been a goal of mine.

However, unlike my father, I have never been truly passionate about running. Consequently, I have always found excuses here and there to hold off participating.

But then, earlier this year, my paternal uncle sadly took his own life. I realized then that I had to stop making excuses, get over my lack of love for running, and complete the marathon alongside my dad. 

While I cannot go back in time and change the past, I can help to prevent this terrible loss from happening to others. If running the marathon saves just one life, then it would have been more than worth it.

Today is World Suicide Prevention Day. Many push through emotional turmoil alone in silence, contributing to a further decline in their mental well-being. The 2023 report from National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health revealed that 73% of people who died by suicide between 2010 and 2020 in the UK were not in contact with mental health services in the year before they died. I believe these services are necessary, do make a difference, and ultimately save lives. 

The NHS (UK free healthcare system) funding for suicide prevention measures will end by March next year. Measures included suicide prevention training for GPs and non-mental health professionals and have been effective according to recipients. Moreover, a new study has revealed that one in four people with mental health problems have to wait a minimum of three months to start NHS treatment. Although private therapy is available in the UK to avoid long waiting times, the cost of one session can be up to £70. 

In other words, national mental health services are simply not accessible to all. However, helplines offer 24/7 free support to everyone. 

Still, maintaining the helpline is no easy task. Every 10 seconds, a volunteer responds to a call for help. If we want to prevent suicide, through monetary aid or awareness, we need to continue supporting charities like the Samaritans, Shout (for folks who prefer to receive support through text), Papyrus HOPELINEUK (for folks under the age of 35), the Community Advice and Listening Line (for folks in Wales), and Switchboard (for folks who identify as LGBTQ+, available from 10 am-10 pm daily).

We also need to break the stigma around mental health and suicide. In 2021 alone, over 5,000 suicides were registered in the UK. Yet, we are not talking enough about it. 

By training for and running the marathon, my father and I aim to initiate conversations about suicide and mental health. We intend to achieve this by talking to people both personally and in the media. 

My dad and I have also had the chance to speak on BBC Radio London about the marathon and the helpline. Moreover, our father-daughter marathon journey has caught the attention of newspapers across the UK, including The Independent.

The more suicide and mental health are spoken about both in casual conversation and in the media, the less stigmatised they will be.

We also want everyone to know that no one is truly alone and that there is always someone to listen. 

This World Suicide Prevention Day, I would like to invite you to join me and ask that you think and talk openly about suicide this September and continue the conversation throughout the year. By talking more about it, we can collectively erase the fears and discomfort that we all too often feel when talking about our struggles. 

I dream that we all may become samaritans to each other, listening without judgement and offering support in this all too often intense world.

My uncle used to support my dad at the end of the London Marathon at Embankment Station. On 21st April 2024, after 26 miles of tears, joy, and laughter, I imagine I will feel a sense of honour and pride in completing my first marathon alongside my dad in my home city. And I like to think that when we both look up at the finish line, we will see my uncle cheering us on.

Isabella Lock

Isabella Lock

Isabella (she/her) is a freelance journalist with an interest in mental health and culture. Her written work has been published in The Independent and Metro. Isabella has also co-produced a short film and independently released a podcast. All her work can be found here: @Isabellalock | Linktree and Isabella can be contacted via Instagram: @isabellalock_journoIf you are interested in supporting the Samaritans, please see here: https://www.samaritans.org/support-us/.
How our liberation and joy are being hijacked by the LGBTQ+ nonprofit sector

How our liberation and joy are being hijacked by the LGBTQ+ nonprofit sector

By Mikail Khan, communications specialist and trans activist

People of the global majority have to deal with racism, classism, transphobia, and white supremacy (to name a few social ills) on a daily basis. Too often, these oppressive norms are perpetuated by people from dominant cultures in progressive spaces. 

More prominently, since the 2020 #BlackLivesMatter summer uprisings, many social justice nonprofits and philanthropic institutions have been rapidly co-opting radical language and making public announcements of their ‘organizational transformations’ when the very real manifestations of white supremacy remain within those structures. 

Similar performative displays have been demonstrated by well-funded mainstream LGBTQ+ nonprofits in metropolitan cities across the U.S. that have historically been founded by white, cis, upwardly mobile gay men and women.

A brief history of the LGBTQ+ nonprofit landscape

…once I completed the onboarding process and became more familiar with various dynamics, the messaging used in the marketing plan’s audience-facing collateral was in stark contrast to the internal value systems and carceral HR processes of these organizations. 

These past two decades have seen numerous BIPOC trans professionals slowly and, at times, unwillingly inserting themselves into the progressive nonprofit industrial complex (NPIC). Due to our current social order’s fixation on trans bodies, where our basic human rights are being stripped away, a lot of us have now ended up in this seemingly ‘social good’ sector where we want to fight for a good cause. 

Yet this naive promise and pursuit of equality for all has created a false separation of injustice from our everyday lives. The NPIC and philanthropy are easily self-perpetuating systems (aka: working toward its self-preservation), and not a fundamental restructuring of power and society. It is futile to think that nonprofits can stand in the way of failing states, failing democracies, and failing economies. Still, as workers, we often project these aspirations onto ‘cause-driven’ workplaces. 

This rigged model doesn’t allow trans nonprofit workers from oppressed backgrounds to challenge the status quo as we try to work from the inside to change the fabric of these institutions. The same logic applies to an employee within LGBTQ+ institutional settings, where we are working harder than ever, but unable to secure meaningful power or impact.

I have worked in the LGBTQ+ mission-specific nonprofit sector in New York for the past six years.  As someone with an abolitionist mindset, I knew there would be various contradictions working as a trans, chronically ill, immigrant of color in the NPIC. How could there not be? The work being done in this complex is uncomfortable and messy, given the neoliberal capitalist alliances between governments, funders, and charitable entities. 

I got involved in nonprofit communications and development activities because I genuinely wanted to work for the liberation of Black and brown trans, gender nonconforming, and intersex folks, whether it be diverting resources back into the community, or building narrative power. For some time, it was difficult to get hired by non-LGBTQ+ organizations due to my ongoing medical transition as a transmasculine individual. 

Given my upbringing in Bangladesh and lack of access to LGBTQ+ professional settings, I also felt I should be grateful for getting a chance to work at these organizations. I dedicated myself to the work with the hopes that we trans BIPOC folks might be encouraged to demonstrate leadership and courage and reimagine the world we live in to pursue queer and trans liberationthe premise by which I was brought in to craft progressive marketing and communications messaging at these institutions. 

However, once I completed the onboarding process and became more familiar with various dynamics, the messaging used in the marketing plan’s audience-facing collateral was in stark contrast to the internal value systems and carceral HR processes of these organizations. 

A majority of these rooms were dominated by cis straight, gay, and/or lesbian liberals in various shades (Caucasian white, white Latine, Savarna, brown, Black) whose sole purpose was to keep churning the wheels of liberal “advocacy” and “allyship,” and who didn’t seem invested in confronting the cycles of violence facing some of the most marginalized community members.

Unsurprisingly, the organizational hierarchy determined who was deemed the most valuable worker and who could be discarded. The lowest rung of the hierarchy tended to be working-class Black and brown trans folks with minimal safety nets but who were performing essential public-facing work (front desk personnel, support group facilitators) at minimum wage, while the cis white CEO was earning close to mid-level six figures. 

The whiplash intensified when the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) consultants were brought in regularly to engage the organizations in racial and gender equity transformative dialogues. These sessions concluded with some colleagues, most of whom were white/white-aligned and cis, feeling a sense of accomplishment, while Black and brown trans folk left feeling even more disenchanted.

When equity work becomes self and community betrayal

Phrases such as ‘liberation’ and ‘trans joy’ are now neatly packaged within newsletters, social media channels, cause marketing products, and end-of-year fundraising appeals to convey messages of healing and accountability when these values and actions have not been meaningfully embedded within the organization.

Let’s acknowledge that things are really fucked up in the world today. In the realm of LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S., over four hundred anti-LGBTQ bills were introduced between January and April of this year alone, including laws to ban drag performances, erase public school curricula of LGBTQ+ content, censor books from public libraries, ban gender-affirming care for minors as well as adults, and forcibly de-transition adults. Fascism has been creating a chokehold on trans people’s existence for some time now, and it is up to everyone, especially cis people, to illuminate and counter the attacks on our bodily autonomy and right to claim space.

Equity work should consider how contemporary social crises coupled with race, gender, disability, and other vulnerabilities might impact the life cycle of an employee within the organization. The focus should be to help the employee flourish in their roles so they, in turn, can help serve the organizational base and community members’ visions of healing and justice. Instead, I have observed that cis LGBQ+ nonprofit leaders and DEI consultants work together to use movement-building language from frontline organizers as a public relations and fundraising strategy. A narrative of healing, accountability, and progress is carefully constructed (read: branded) without staking any claim in material redistribution or furthering our political demands. 

Phrases such as ‘liberation’ and ‘trans joy’ are now neatly packaged within newsletters, social media channels, cause marketing products, and end-of-year fundraising appeals to convey messages of healing and accountability when these values and actions have not been meaningfully embedded within the organization. 

Don’t get me wronginternal contradictions are a product of external forces. Institutional changes do take time and consistent efforts from invested workers. Additionally, nonprofit workers will not be 100% aligned with one another on the various tactics needed to achieve our collective freedom. So many of our culture and political wars have also pitted us against one another, creating an environment of distrust and conflict. 

Considering all these nuances, I am providing an example of top-heavy institutions that don’t have a strategic plan or theory of change in place and are taking up space in the LGBTQI progressive landscape. Such spaces have not internally engaged in a robust power analysis to create people-centered and trauma-informed infrastructures, yet are financing their public rebrands to hoard more resources that our trans and intersex BIPOC communities desperately need to build joyful worlds.

The cost of neoliberal identity politics on trans of color lives

Merely identifying oppressive behaviors and systems does not mean people are willing to step out of their comfort zone to do the hard and necessary work of dismantling them. For all the trans representation and candidacy appointments in the media and electoral offices that LGBTQ+ nonprofit executives have pushed forth, it has not mobilized larger society to stop the tidal wave of violence that trans people from oppressed backgrounds are facing in the U.S. and across the world. 

The need to build power for those facing the most harm in our communities is becoming eclipsed by the politics of representation and identity.

Due to the narrow requests that are part and parcel of trans visibility campaigns, things have started shifting for mostly elite trans people. Recognizing some of these disparities, DEI measures are working with mainstream LGBQ+ cis-led organizations to actively recruit multiply marginalized candidates with various lived experiences, namely those from working-class, disabled, trans, and intersex backgrounds. But how have these organizations developed internal practices to ensure the safety and leadership development of these candidates without their identities being infantilized? 

Safety for trans people within LGBTQ+ mission-specific organizations will demand that cis leaders reject a respectability politics that is pushing entry and mid-level BIPOC trans workers from oppressed backgrounds to embody the white cis supremacist foundations that these 30+ year-old organizations claim to be actively moving away from. The imposition of cis dominated culture thoughts and values on trans folks trying to build new worlds needs to stop.

Moving away from neutrality and toward principled struggle

We all deserve to play a part in shaping a world that works for us. For the foreseeable future, this will come through the self-organization and solidarity economies being built by workers and some of the most oppressed community members.

Most cis LGBQ+ leaders need to acknowledge that demanding a seat at the table is not ‘joy’ or ‘liberation’ that they are so intent on copy-pasting into their values statements. It’s a desire to be acknowledged by those in power. 

It’s the liberal notion of individual success which makes structural change unrealistic or unnecessary. If nonprofits continue operating neutrally, they will keep diverting our attention toward things overwhelming our nervous systems. These methods are causing LGBTQ+ nonprofit leaders to invest in solutions that aren’t addressing our community’s basic needs that would allow them to survive and eventually thrive. I’ve observed this decision-making ladder to be a source of regular conflict between the lower echelon of workers and the leadership structure–where direct service or program nonprofit workers are overworked and underpaid to meet the communities’ immediate needs, but the leadership teams cannot fulfill said requests due to their ‘profits over people’ mindset. 

As workers, we also don’t know how to deal with conflict effectively. With no training on how generative conflict can be practiced, reactionary LGBQ+ cis leadership use tactics such as performance improvement plans, to push out ‘difficult’ trans and queer employees who want to engage in values-aligned work. 

A perfect example is the recent union busting of Trevor Project’s unionization efforts by a volatile leadership team who went against their mission and values and laid off 12% of the bargaining unit employees

Under these constraints, how can decisions be made that reflect the organizational values LGBTQ+ mission-specific institutions seek to uphold? Here are a few considerations I would like to bring to the table:

  1. Solutions over critique: One way to make better decisions is not to let critique be the end goal of workplace equity conversations. Hollow proposals of organizational change without encouraging regular feedback and implementation sessions from both employees and community members are creating illusory hopes for some of the most promising workers from oppressed backgrounds, who eventually quit. More points of alignment for trans and intersex BIPOC workers need to be built on an internal scale, particularly because our communities have been constantly sidelined and dehumanized by cis LGBQ+ people since the beginning of the contemporary ‘gay rights’ movement.
  2. De-professionalizing and unionizing the workplace: Professionalization, as an industry, has harmed trans and intersex BIPOC workers more so than any other identity group, where we’ve had to follow rigid gender roles to keep our jobs. If these LGBTQ+ organizations want to bring about ‘liberation’ as per their values statements, they will need to stop treating their most oppressed workers as instruments of productivity. They must stop perpetuating the current system that values efficiency (e.g., harsh performance reviews and surveillance) over workers’ rights. Workers should have the freedom and resources to unionize and convey the strong message that our lives are not disposable, no matter how we choose to show up in the workplace.
  3. Recognizing NPIC’s limits and building alternate structures: Nonprofits are an extension of the current governmental and corporate establishments that aren’t improving LGBTQ+ people’s material conditions. Understanding this limitation is critical in developing an alternate long-term strategy for building the power of our various movements. Talking to conflicted audiences, supporters, and donors will be very difficult, but sharing these tactics within organizations’ annual strategic plans will inspire hope and build trust between workers on all levels. 

Overall, my observations while working at LGBTQ+ mission-specific organizations have highlighted the need for a fundamental transformation of the LGBTQ+ mission-specific nonprofit organizational superstructure. Such spaces need to bring in principled leadershipthose that will honor worker-owned control of resources, provide financial transparency, and prioritize workers’ health over profits. The same leaders must confront the truth that most systemic changes will not arrive through the nonprofit sector, which upholds the capitalist system. 

We all deserve to play a part in shaping a world that works for us. For the foreseeable future, this will come through the self-organization and solidarity economies being built by workers and some of the most oppressed community members. Whether the end result will be the dismantling of the non-profit or philanthropic industry and the co-creation of new ways of working together will depend on whether we are ready to engage in the vulnerable conversations and strategic coalitions needed to safeguard our planet against rising global authoritarianism. What will we choose?

Mikail Khan

Mikail Khan

Mikail Khan (they/he) is a Bangladeshi transvisionary & immunocompromised queer Muslim communications specialist, organizer, and film curator/worker living between New York and South Asia. You can follow them at @banglatheyshi on Instagram.

Knowing

Knowing

By Abigail Oduol, a Black planned gift fundraiser in Southern California

This piece is for Black and Indigenous people of color to find themselves in and ask how they define themselves… and for everyone, especially white allies, to more deeply interrogate how they uphold cultural Whiteness in workplaces where we exist.

Artist Statement

The following is a poem that I wrote after returning home from a three-year immersive schooling and working experience in Kenya. I began my experience studying transformational urban leadership in a Kibera slum and grappling with my identity. Then I worked as a refugee resettlement caseworker, interviewing refugees as a part of their acceptance into the US Refugee Admissions Program. 

Several years later, I came back to this piece while in my current role at an environmental nonprofit and reflected on how my identity – as an American, Black, cisgender, heterosexual woman trying to raise bicultural Kenyan children while working in planned gift fundraising –  has since evolved and what it means considering recent experiences.

I reflected on the complexities of how I define myself internally, how others define me, and how other external experiences have affected my self-definition. And how those influences gradually shifted my identity from an individualistic definition into a collectivist perception. 

This piece is for Black and Indigenous people of color to find themselves in and ask how they define themselves – the positive, negative, and neutral – and for everyone, especially white allies, to more deeply interrogate how they uphold cultural Whiteness in workplaces where we exist.   — Abigail

Knowing

I know in America.
Knowing only one person out of the entire Black neighborhood went to college, but that the others were restrained by invisible hands and so I am the only in my school, department, program.
Unworthiness for a request for consent to touch hair with dirty hands, to touch my body while dancing.  

Knowing even in a fictional universe, I exist only to provide contour and character development.

Knowing that looking “exotic” will never be the same as “beautiful.”
Realizing cameras were not designed to capture your special moments, nude products not for your nudity, your hair, skin, history, and cooking techniques not for standard curriculum.

I know.
Knowing that I choose my hairstyle, but do not choose that it is a political rather than personal expression.

Knowing my color stands between me and a relationship, me and an upgraded hotel room, me and the border to the next town.

Knowing the gap between I did it independently and I am an undeserving recipient of charity in the eyes of ever watching others.

Knowing in the dark corners that systems fight me at every turn, and I must violently war against them in unavailing self-sacrifice or die patiently in chains waiting to be released.

Knowing to tattle on the system or support those who do, you are discredited as an angry, paranoid conspiracy theorist.

 

I know. Our mother is abusive, and I love and hate her equally. I know.
Today I am exhausted, and in no ways tired.

Knowing that regularly is a direct or indirect betrayal of humanity, smiling while minimizing contributions to the space and selectively wielding bureaucracy as a blunt object, claiming plausible deniability.

Knowing that in sharing the struggle to exist, nods in agreement too often point at a soulless other and never their own reflection.

Knowing that exercises in accountability cause a white lash of arguments on good intentions, of hyper vigilance, of police union comradery. Of you, the ungrateful, not enjoying your charitable pennies.
 

I know. Blackness was created here as a foil for whiteness. I know it is fluid and complex. I know.

It is the ignored pebble that creates the avalanche.

Knowing bellowing songs sung within chains of the past and present, and the blinding streaks of hope across my landscape.

It is the blank space that creates afresh.

Knowing it is pigeons forced to adapt to an invading city now destroy structures with their acidic droppings.

It is my past and my hope, the small window at the top of a prison cell that maintains dreams amid pain, oppression and struggle.

Knowing it is hot glowing coals beneath a fire walker’s bare feet, the embodiment of the moving current.

It is inhabiting a world both not yet and fully realized as we shape it.

Abigail Oduol

Abigail Oduol

Abigail Oduol’s (she/hers) surname is not Irish or Pennsylvania Dutch. It’s Kenyan. She keeps her escape pod in Kenya ready, and checks on it regularly with her young kids and husband. Abigail serves on the CCF Global Council, NACGP D&I committee and with her local PTA.  Follow her musings on threads @abby_oduol and longer thoughts on LinkedIn. You can send tips and micro reparations to her Cashapp $AbbyOduol.

Beyond Philanthropy: Disrupting Through Organizing #BringAFoldingChair

Beyond Philanthropy: Disrupting Through Organizing #BringAFoldingChair

I think there’s plenty to learn from this experience in Montgomery…That could have ended so badly, as we’ve seen in the news, right? And it didn’t, and like the racists got their comeuppance…I think this is the energy we need…we need to stop talking about like being nice and civil, or whatever, and start organizing, and pushing back and grabbing a chair…

— Vu Le

About the podcast episode

In this episode, Monique and Valerie sit down with Vu Le, Creator of NonprofitAF and one of the Founders of Community Centric Fundraising, to discuss how nonprofits leaders need to grab a folding chair and organize to save our communities and how funders need to shift practices to do the same.

About Beyond Philanthropy

Beyond Philanthropy is a podcast about how we can move beyond traditional philanthropy from co-hosts Monique Curry-Mims & Valerie Johnson. This season, each monthly episode examines systemic change and how to be disruptive in your philanthropy practice, with a mix of episodes featuring our co-hosts and episodes featuring guests from across the country.

Episode Transcript

Read the full episode transcript here.

Monique Curry-Mims (she/her) and Valerie Johnson (she/her) are cohosts of Beyond Philanthropy Podcast

Monique Curry-Mims

Monique Curry-Mims

Monique Curry-Mims has over 15 years of business and leadership experience in both the nonprofit and for-profit sectors. As Principal of Civic Capital Consulting, an international social impact consulting firm, Monique delivers innovative strategies that help organizations meet their mission and goals, education services that empower solutions and equity, and funding to help communities working on the ground be part of the change they need. To further change impact, Monique serves as a steering committee member of Philadelphia Black Giving Circle, Trustee and the Allocations Chair of Union Benevolent Association, and a Committee Member of AFP Global’s Government Relations Committee. Additionally, Monique serves as Founder and Convener of PHLanthropy Week and co-host of Beyond Philanthropy alongside Valerie Johnson.

Valerie Johnson

Valerie Johnson

Valerie Johnson joined Pathways to Housing PA as Director of Institutional Advancement in 2018, and was promoted to VP of Advancement and Special Projects in 2021. She co-hosts a podcast, Beyond Philanthropy, alongside Monique Curry-Mims. She was also the Director of Advancement for Council for Relationships and worked as a fundraiser for Valley Youth House and the American Association for Cancer Research. Valerie, a Certified Fundraising Executive, holds a Bachelor’s degree in Marketing and an MBA from Drexel University. A member of the Association of Fundraising Professionals since 2012, she serves on the Greater Philadelphia Chapter’s Board of Directors as Vice President of Education and Professional Development. Valerie has been a featured speaker for the Pennsylvania Association of Nonprofit Organizations, NTEN, AFP GPC, and AFP Brandywine, and contributes to Generocity. You can find her on Twitter and Instagram, where you’ll see plenty of running and baking content alongside her cats, Agador and Spartacus. 

To tip Valerie and Monique for their work on their podcast, Venmo them at: @valer1ej