Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs) and how the sector resists change

Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs) and how the sector resists change

By Abigail Oduola Black planned gift fundraiser in California

Donor-advised funds (DAFs) continue to grow at a ridiculous rate, and criticism of them continues to be limited, and I thought it time to follow up on how the sector resists needed change.

In 2024, I wrote an article about donor-advised funds and how we can change the sector. 

Donor-advised funds (DAFs) continue to grow at a ridiculous rate, and criticism of them continues to be limited, and I thought it time to follow up on how the sector resists needed change. 

(Plus, it’s tax time, so what better time to think about all the massive deductions itemizers are taking by bulk dropping money into their DAF when they are undecided on which charity to support with it– —please decide, now would be a great time.)

In case you missed the first article or don’t feel like reading it, I’m talking about Donor-Advised Funds, defined by the National Philanthropic Trust as “a giving account established at a public charity. The 501(c)(3) public charity serves as a ‘sponsoring organization,’ which manages and administers individual DAF accounts.”

The economics, ethics, and law folks are talking about DAFs and I’m here with my popcorn drizzled in olive oil, salt, and berbere because I’m feeling like I want all the smoke. 

Tuck in, we’re about to dive in deep with some news, views, and action items.

What’s happened in the world of DAFs in the past few years?

Reforming Donor-Advised Funds” published in The Regulatory Review has a lot of very detailed information about what’s been happening with DAFs. I’m going to quote it a few times when explaining what has and hasn’t happened.

David Walker from the Boston University School of Law saw that “new DAF accounts “skyrocketed” after the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). He attributes much of this growth to taxpayers seeking to maximize their total tax deduction by “bunching” years of philanthropy into a single year.” 

DAFs don’t make up a massive portion of overall giving, but there has been a consistent and persistent shift from private foundations into DAFs, and these long-term trends together with the TCJA and its pending renewal and doubling down on tax cuts are a part of the wider picture of why there are persistent reports that giving is overall down across the board.

The same year as the TCJA was enacted, DAF holder, Philip Pinkert, sued Schwab Charitable Fund (the suit was dismissed in 2021). Philip was upset about not being able to make choices about the money. But the whole point of a DAF is that donors have lost control of where the money goes after transferring it to the sponsoring organization (in this case, Schwab Charitable), so they had no standing (no legal right to participate in the court case). 

The tax court ruled that the money doesn’t belong to them anymore and said, effectively, “If you don’t like how they do it, then be more careful in the future.” 

In 2019, a proposal from Bay Area assembly member Buffy Wicks to the California legislature would have required a payout rate disclosure to find out how often wealth warehousing is actually happening. Wealth warehousing is when DAF accounts have money for charity but don’t award it. It was supposed to be the first hard data on this. But that legislation died in 2020. It was heavily opposed by the Silicon Valley Community Foundation for whom equity and social justice is a “main program focus” (and who held, at the time, $8.9 billion—with a B—in assets). 

Then in 2023, some US Senators tried to create the Accelerating Charitable Efforts or ACE Act. It was a bipartisan attempt to speed up donor-advised funds payments. According to the reporting by the Chronicle of Philanthropy, the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP) and others lobbied hard against it stating “Organizations that offer donor-advised funds, along with a handful of other philanthropy groups, spent $11 million from 2018 to 2023 to block legislation to force donor-advised funds to distribute more to charity. That’s according to an examination of congressional lobbying records conducted by the Institute for Policy Studies, which favors stricter rules governing the popular charitable accounts.” The charities said that it would cause donors to give less. 

In 2023, there were some long-awaited proposed IRS regulations for DAFs. Funnily enough, these new regulations didn’t touch the payout aspect. At. All.

As of November 2024, an article by Rasheeda Childress of the Chronicle of Philanthropy quoted Chuck Collins, program director at the think tank Institute for Policy Studies, saying, “We’re talking about a quarter trillion dollars that is not flowing immediately in a timely way to active nonprofits.” “This tells us that funds continue to be warehoused.” 

Big DAF says, “We’ll release the money… eventually!”

There’s still a problem. But it’s a solvable problem.

So, what does this all mean? It means that there’s still a problem. And it’s a solvable problem. 

Some solutions I gleaned from The Regulatory Review article and other sources, including thought leaders like Kerry Gibbons, Jon Pratt, and David Walker, included the following wishlist for federal- and state-level solutions.

  • Limit tax deductions for charitable contributions to appreciated property.
  • Amend current tax subsidies for charitable giving.
  • Impose obligations on decision-makers to consider intergenerational justice when deciding how much to spend or retain, rather than strictly adhering to private foundation payout rates or legal time limits.
  • Develop oversight and distribution protocols for DAFs.
  • At the federal level, explicitly ban private foundations from using DAFs to avoid payout requirements.
  • At the state level, give state attorneys general more oversight power over private foundation grantmaking. Connect with state attorneys and encourage them to be accountable to you, the voter, on holding DAF-holding charities accountable, and thinking about ways to implement some of the suggestions.
  • Contact your House representatives and let them know this is important to you.

Ian Murray brought in the principle of intergenerational justice—the idea that there are moral responsibilities shared across different generations, and we need to consider our ethical responsibilities to past and future generations rather than 5% payout rates and legal minimums. 

What are the oversight and distribution protocols and how do we make DAFs more responsive to current and future needs? Murray recommends procedural reforms, such as developing oversight and distribution protocols, as well as enhancing the responsiveness and flexibility of DAFs to meet current and future needs. 

So, now that we know what the experts suggest, what can we do as fundraising professionals?

Talk to the people who will listen to you and organize. It is really similar to power mapping that you find with unionization efforts. Who do you have a connection to? Who could you have a connection to because of shared affinity? 

This can be included in the intentionality of networking and diversification work and involves conversations with colleagues, donors, and those outside of your circle. Here are some starting ideas:

Talking with Colleagues

  • Present/host discussions at grants, stewardship, and other professional associations and get your colleagues talking about this critically. This will allow you to find other organizations, discuss strategies, and encourage more movement in this area.
  • Think about, talk about, and then engage in ‘blended giving’ for annual and major giving teams, especially if you don’t have a planned giving team. Either way, a collaboration between folks such as grant writers and individual gifts teams might help in creating a unified strategy on how to disrupt DAF proliferation and solve immediate challenges surrounding them.
  • I criticized them for the bad, now for the good: Vox reported that in 2019, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation required that if a donor does not make a recommendation for “at least a $200 gift over two years, foundation leaders reclaim 5 percent of the account balance if no contribution is made in the next three months. And if the donors continue to hoard money for four years, then the entire DAF account’s balance is reclaimed by the SVCF for its own grant-making strategy.” In 2019 SVCF was in the process of shortening the rule to three years and I hope they’ve made further progress. This goes to show that if you are at a DAF holding institution, you can make your own rules to help the money flow outward. 

Talking to donors

  • Have conversations with people that include talking about the responsibilities of having a DAF, in addition to the privileges. Here are some suggestions for this conversation:
    • Make sure that your vision, your values, and your money are aligned.
    • If you are receiving a charitable tax deduction, it means that you have donated money to be for the public good. Because the money no longer belongs to you, you got the deduction. And because you got the deduction, the money needs to be put into action today.
    • Have conversations with people who want to grow ‘their money’ to build a ‘legacy’ far down in the future, explaining that DAFs are not the correct vehicle for this (they should look into estate planning and invest in other vehicles that have a higher yield; the DAF is not an appropriate vehicle to get to that destination).

Networking with Finance and Tax professionals

  • Does your job involve making referrals? Get to know the people you’re referring. Invite them to local Charitable Gift Planner meetings so they can get to know allied professionals and gift planners who can speak similar financial language about what is more and less helpful if someone has donative intent. And if you’re not a part of your local charitable gift planning meetings, look them up, get there and have these conversations there.
  • Have conversations with finance and tax professionals about their work and how it relates to charitable gift planning. If it’s tax season and someone helps you with your taxes, talk with them briefly about this and ask their opinion. Start a relationship!
  • See if your institution can offer continuing education for CPAs—try to form relationships with people at the institutional level; planned giving teams can be a great connector and help you include financial and wealth managers.
  • Present/start discussions with your local chapter of CPA groups like the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants.
  • Promote the idea that we’re all part of the philanthropic sector now (including CPAs and financial planners who might not necessarily see themselves this way).
  • Set up recurring meetings and stewardship with people hosting DAFs, philanthropic officers, etc. These folks are connectors and though they are engaged in the sector, they have a very different vantage point of how and why it works. Connecting with them and educating them is your gift of service that keeps on giving.

We live in a reality where the problems seem impossible to solve on an individual level. But for the growing pains that we’re experiencing with the proliferation of DAFS, that’s only partly true. There is much we can do at an individual, team, and group level to make it known that the status quo isn’t working for many smaller organizations. We can, together, push philanthropy in the right direction by each finding the area we want to pursue and then pushing forward. Encourage others that are frustrated about DAFs to consult this list of actions and find a way of pushing forward that they can do. With that, happy tax season whether you do your taxes. Or don’t.

Abigail Oduol

Abigail Oduol

Abigail Oduol’s (she/hers) surname is not Irish or Pennsylvania Dutch. It’s Kenyan. She keeps her escape pod in Kenya ready, and checks on it regularly with her young kids and husband. Abigail serves on the CCF Global Council, NACGP D&I committee and with her local PTA.  You can send tips and micro reparations to her Cashapp $AbbyOduol. Connect with Abigail on LinkedIn.

Principle 5 in action: Why volunteer engagement deserves equal investment and how to start investing in it

Principle 5 in action: Why volunteer engagement deserves equal investment and how to start investing in it

By Jessica Pang-Parks, Advocate for volunteerism and volunteer engagement —  helping nonprofits build trust, create impact, and inspire belonging

A key reason I was drawn to Community-Centric Fundraising (CCF) is Principle 5: Time is valued equally as money. Yet, in most nonprofit organizations, volunteer engagement is not valued as equally as donor engagement.

It was a Monday. The senior fundraiser, who had barely acknowledged me prior, made a remark—definitely not a request: “I need fifteen volunteers for the golf tournament on Thursday.”

I explained that volunteer recruitment is a process that typically takes six to eight weeks. In the volunteer engagement cycle, planning comes before recruitment. I asked when their team had started planning the golf tournament. They ignored my question and simply said, “Just do your job.”

Taken aback, I calmly clarified that my job was to be a strategic fundraising partner, an internal consultant, and a professional subject matter expert. The senior fundraiser rolled their eyes. “Don’t you have a pool of high school students who need their service hours?” they asked.

I continued to keep my composure as I illustrated why maintaining a volunteer pool was poor practice. Volunteer schedules and goals shift constantly, and just like donor stewardship, volunteer stewardship should be personalized. 

I then posed a question: “As a parent, how would you feel if your teenager was asked to take time off school to volunteer at a golf course—one that’s inaccessible by transit and where alcohol will be served?”

They rolled their eyes again and dismissed me from their office. 

I promised to follow up with a volunteer role description template and timelines for future requests. But inside, I was seething.

As a volunteer engagement professional, I’ve had countless conversations like this. I’ve advocated for policies that improve the volunteer experience, build trust, and mitigate organizational risk. I’ve pushed to be included in project planning meetings, knowing that down the line, colleagues would come asking for volunteer support at the last minute. I’ve had difficult discussions about what constitutes decent volunteer work—like the time I convinced a colleague to remove a volunteer posting for “office janitor.”

A key reason I was drawn to Community-Centric Fundraising (CCF) is Principle 5: Time is valued equally as money. Yet, in most nonprofit organizations, volunteer engagement is not valued as equally as donor engagement.

For most of my career, I worked in volunteer engagement at large, national charities in Canada, supporting fundraisers and fundraising initiatives. When I joined these organizations, I’d look at the org chart and see dozens, sometimes hundreds, of fundraising colleagues—each with a specific role: events, major gifts, donor relations, data, legacy giving, etc., all ultimately accountable to a Chief Development Officer or VP of Fundraising.

Then, I’d look for the volunteer engagement team. Most times, it was just me. Occasionally, I’d have colleagues in other provinces or on specific projects. And who did we report to? Usually a leader in fundraising, communications, mission, or HR—not an executive dedicated to volunteer engagement.

What the stats say.

Through my involvement in volunteer engagement associations for over a decade, I’ve learned that this is the norm. Volunteer engagement professionals are often the only ones in their organization doing this work and frequently have more expertise in leading volunteers than their managers.

In 2024, Volunteer Toronto identified a “critical gap in volunteer management staff and skills” among nonprofits, leading to what many mistakenly call a volunteer shortage. 

I’m not surprised. Many of my peers have left the field for communications, fundraising, or operations roles—because the wages for volunteer engagement professionals are simply too low.

A 2017 study by the Minnesota Alliance for Volunteer Advancement (MAVA) compared nonprofit executives’ perceptions of volunteer engagement professionals versus their fundraising, HR, and programming counterparts. The findings were frustrating, though not surprising. Volunteer engagement professionals were less likely to serve on an executive leadership team and had lower salaries than their fundraising, HR, and programming counterparts. And they were expected to have more experience in community partnerships, personnel management, communications, public speaking, database tracking, and program development than fundraisers or HR professionals.

I didn’t have this data when former managers justified my lower salary by saying, “You don’t bring in revenue.” But I wish I had.

Even setting aside CCF, good volunteer stewardship directly increases revenue. A 2024 study from the Do Good Institute at the University of Maryland found that people who volunteered in the past year were 14.5% more likely to donate in the current year. If you compare your own nonprofit’s donor data, you’ll likely find that donors who volunteer give more frequently and in higher amounts than those who don’t.

Volunteers contribute their most valuable, non-renewable resource: time. They, and the professionals who steward them, deserve decent work.

What Can Nonprofits Do? 

If your organization is serious about Community-Centric Fundraising, consider these actions:

What Can Fundraisers Do? 

If you are ready to advocate for volunteer engagement colleagues, consider these actions: 

  • Build stronger relationships with volunteer engagement professionals by inviting us to share our expertise with your team, and making time to exchange ideas and discuss collaboration on an ongoing basis.
  • Ask leadership critical questions:
    • “Why does the manager of volunteer engagement report to the director of philanthropy?”
    • “Why isn’t there a director of volunteer engagement?”
    • “Why is one person stewarding thousands of volunteers, while dozens of fundraisers steward a similar number of donors?”
  • Recommend talents and experiences of volunteer engagement professionals at tables where we are not yet invited.
  • Educate yourself on volunteer engagement. Beyond CFRE exam prep, check out:

If we want to transform philanthropy together, community-centric fundraisers must walk the talk of Principle 5. That means valuing time as equally as money—not just in theory, but in action.

Jessica Pang-Parks

Jessica Pang-Parks

Jessica Pang-Parks (she/her) has the privilege to work as a community and volunteer engagement consultant on the traditional land of the Huron-Wendat, the Seneca, and the Mississaugas of the Credit. Learn more about Jessica at www.learnwithjpp.com, connect with her on LinkedIn, and leave a tip to support her thought leadership.

Don’t roll back your DEI initiatives. Leverage your power and show some solidarity.

Don’t roll back your DEI initiatives. Leverage your power and show some solidarity.

By Jessie Calero, fundraiser and freelance writer

Now is the time for those of us with privilege to leverage our power and show some solidarity. Now is a great time to examine our ability to divest from federal funding and commit to building a future rooted in justice and authenticity.

For years, nonprofit organizations across the United States have been warned about their reliance on individual donations and grants from private foundations. Funders repeatedly advised nonprofits to pursue federal dollars in order to secure their long-term sustainability. 

As a newly minted fundraiser in the mid-2010s, I embraced this strategy. An organization I worked for at that time invested in my participation in a local fellowship focused on writing federal grant proposals. Less than a year later, we were able to secure our first federally-funded programmatic grant, designed to support young people with disabilities in their transition from high school to adulthood. 

Now this program—and many others like it—are under attack. 

In 90 days, the current administration has proven that federal funding isn’t the panacea we once believed it to be. Trump’s second term has been characterized by some of the most aggressive executive actions we’ve ever seen: attempting to dismantle entire federal agencies, halting enormous swaths of federal spending, and freezing payments for services rendered. While many of these executive efforts have been poorly executed and are actively being challenged through litigation, the chilling effect on the nonprofit community has been immense. 

These funding cuts are particularly alarming given this administration’s open hostility to even the most oblique references to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). 

Organizations that have worked diligently to align with even the most basic tenets of civil rights protections now face scrutiny for using language related to diversity and inclusion. These organizations are at a crossroads: will they continue their DEI efforts, or reverse course in pursuit of renewed federal support?  

Over the past five years, many organizations have invested thousands of dollars and thousands of hours of staff time to pursue internal policy shifts, address gaps in staff training, and develop new language to more accurately describe their work and the communities they serve. These efforts have allowed organizations to expand their workforces and service delivery to better include and meet the unique needs of BlPOC, LGBTQIA+, and disabled folks. But with millions of dollars and critical programs at risk, they have an excuse to halt or even roll back those efforts. 

Some organizations—particularly those led by white, abled, cisgender, heterosexual individuals—may view DEI policies as burdensome and may seek to discard them in favor of aligning with the current administration’s guidelines. 

The Trump administration has already indicated its intention of flagging language that is seen as DEI-related—words that emphasize empathy, accuracy, and cultural competence.  

While there are nonprofits that could find a way to frame their work in a way that excludes this language, there are a lot of organizations that, no matter how they frame their work, simply won’t get federal funding anymore. These organizations are most likely to be led by the marginalized communities they serve and have the least access to affluent individual donors, donor-advised funds, bloated endowments, and private foundations that could supplant federal money (and yes, these sources of funding could replace federal losses if they chose to). 

Now, more than ever, those of us in a position of privilege need to unite in solidarity with the communities most impacted by these cuts. 

Do not roll back your efforts to make trans people feel safe. 

Do not stop engaging in anti-racism. 

Do not eliminate accommodations for people with disabilities. 

Do not scrub your website or proposals to comply with regressive policies and attempts to erase entire communities. 

Now is the time for those of us with privilege to leverage our power and show some solidarity. Now is a great time to examine our ability to divest from federal funding and commit to building a future rooted in justice and authenticity.

This is an opportunity for all of us to re-examine where we get our funding from and find new ways to sustain our work. 

Together, we can forge a future where our commitment to equity, justice, and inclusion drives real change—no matter what happens in Washington. 

Jessie Calero

Jessie Calero

Jessie Calero (she/her/hers) is a life-long resident of New Mexico who earned her Bachelor and Master of Arts degrees from the University of New Mexico. With over 10 years of experience in nonprofit leadership and fundraising, Jessie serves as a development professional within a civil legal services organization in Albuquerque, New Mexico. She enjoys freelance writing and tackling home improvement projects in her spare time. As an autistic woman, Jessie also provides training focused on ableism and its impacts to nonprofit organizations and community businesses that want to prioritize accessibility, inclusivity, and universal design. She can be reached via email or on LinkedIn.

Tired of fair-weather funders who pull funding when it’s most needed? Fund it yourselves.

Tired of fair-weather funders who pull funding when it’s most needed? Fund it yourselves.

By Maria Rio, CEO of Further Together, provider of no-nonsense truths and actionable tips, and host of The Small Nonprofit podcast

Self-funding means your board doesn’t have to side-eye every press release. It means you can call out injustice, push for systemic change, and stay true to your mission—without sugarcoating or playing nice. Our work is about breaking chains, not asking for longer ones.

You want to advocate for housing rights? To challenge racist policies? To demand environmental justice? Then stop tying your fate to a system designed to keep you quiet. 

The funding freezes and recent House bill threatening nonprofits over alleged “terrorist ties” are just the latest reminder that the same systems you fight against are the ones writing the checks. The nonprofit industrial complex is on full display right now, and if we want to make it through the dark times ahead, we need to build our own power—starting with our wallets.

If we want to keep our voices loud and our movements strong, we need to fund them ourselves. 

No more cancelled DEI initiatives. No more appeasing donors who “aren’t comfortable” with radical truth-telling. No more wondering if today’s politician will tank your budget.

Social enterprise is the answer. It’s viable. It’s scalable. The question isn’t if your organization can make this work; it’s how fast you can get started. How can your organization deliver value in a way that addresses a gap in the market? Maybe it’s a product, a service, or even a fee-for-service program that serves your community and fuels your mission.

Why we need to fund it ourselves:

Advocacy

Many donors are terrified of being “too political.” They’ll write checks for safe, non-controversial causes but vanish the second you push for real change. And the truth many of us understand is that we could never fully rely on white liberal dollars; they either have skin in the game, or they don’t.

Self-funding means your board doesn’t have to side-eye every press release. It means you can call out injustice, push for systemic change, and stay true to your mission—without sugarcoating or playing nice. Our work is about breaking chains, not asking for longer ones.

Resilience

As Kamala said: “We organize, mobilize. We educate, and we advocate—because, you see, our power has never come from having an easy path. Our strength flows from our faith—faith in God, faith in each other—and our refusal to surrender to cynicism and destruction, not because it is easy, but because it is necessary, not because victory is guaranteed, but because the fight is worth it.” 

State and local leaders are being strong-armed into submission, and entire communities are being held hostage by funding threats. The danger of losing programs and progress when funders and governments pull support isn’t a hypothetical—it’s happening now.

With trans rights, immigrant protections, and reproductive justice under fire, we can’t afford to lose ground. 

Funding ourselves means our communities can count on us through every storm. While others scale back, self-funded organizations can double down, meeting immediate needs and building long-term resistance. 

Organizations with social enterprise successes:

💥 FoodReach – program by North York Harvest Food Bank (NYHFB)

NYHFB’s FoodReach program is living proof that “a rising tide lifts all boats.” 

This social enterprise uses collective purchasing power to help nearly 200 nonprofits get high-quality food at deeply reduced rates. Acting as a bulk buyer, FoodReach negotiates lower prices on essential food items and passes those savings directly to its partners.

With $2 million in annual revenue, FoodReach is funding NYHFB and creating a ripple effect of stability across the sector. By helping partners save an average of 35% on food costs, the program gives funds and power back to nonprofits. In turn, those savings fund programs, increase capacity, and provide a financial cushion against funding cuts. This business-to-business social enterprise model helps build a nonprofit sector with real muscle, ready to push back when it matters most.

💥 The SEED – program by Guelph Community Health Center

The SEED believes access to healthy food is a human right; and their business-to-consumer social enterprise model is a masterclass in dignified programming. Their Sliding Scale Grocery Program allows those experiencing poverty to shop in spaces with people who are not experiencing poverty. There’s no “us” and “them,” just a shared space where everyone is treated with respect. 

Customers can pay anywhere from $0 to full price, with wealthier shoppers naturally subsidizing those in need. It’s community solidarity in action, and it builds a culture of equity and mutual support. 

On top of that, The SEED runs a business-to-business social enterprise model by buying and reselling food wholesale, generating a steady stream of revenue. 

What started with just $60k in sales nine years ago has exploded to $800k in wholesale revenue and $2.2 million in donated food annually. This model now covers a third of The SEED’s operating costs, giving them stability and independence.

💥 Southside Blooms – program by Chicago Eco House

Southside Blooms, a project by Chicago Eco House, believes that every community deserves beauty, opportunity, and real agency. They’re turning neglected urban spaces into vibrant flower farms that deliver both economic and environmental benefits. They then deliver locally grown flowers sold to businesses and consumers, generating $2 million in annual revenue. 

Through this program, they support Chicago’s Englewood community by offering training and employment in urban agriculture and horticulture. By providing job skills and work opportunities, they give residents a paycheck and a stake in the revitalization of their own neighborhood. 

This social enterprise model turns blight into bloom, joblessness into opportunity, and community spaces into hubs of pride and ownership. 

Southside Blooms proves that when nonprofits adopt a business mindset, they can achieve lasting change. Moreover, this financial independence means Southside Blooms can expand its initiatives without constantly chasing donor dollars.

 

This is what innovation looks like; solving a problem and strengthening the community simultaneously. But these organizations aren’t the only ones. Through their fee-for-service Out In Schools programs, Out On Screen is delivering critical education on inclusivity and acceptance while generating sustainable revenue. Similarly, Strong Minds Strong Kids has covered 17% of their operating budget through paid program delivery. These innovative social enterprise models support the community and positions these two orgs as leaders in providing meaningful, paid educational services.

As a final example, let’s take Back 2 School America—an organization dedicated to ensuring that kids of all income levels have access to much-needed school supplies. To meet this vision, B2SA partners with companies who give funds to participate in their team-building “Build a Kit” days, giving employees a valued experience while creating school supply kits for kids across America. Through this business-to-business social enterprise model, B2SA has managed to cover over 70% of its operating expenses.

How do we get started?

  • Step 1: Identify services: What does your organization already do that could generate income?
  • Step 2: Start small: Pilot a product or service with a clear value proposition.
  • Step 3: Measure profitability: Ensure alignment with your mission and financial viability.

If you are seriously considering it, I interviewed Quilen Blackwell, ED of Southside Blooms, on my podcast, The Small Nonprofit. In it, he walks you through how he did it, along with the challenges and opportunities along the way. 

 

Funding yourselves is an act of resistance. It’s a declaration that your mission won’t be held hostage by donors or politicians with ulterior motives. When you build your own revenue streams, you reclaim the power to say what needs to be said, to serve who needs to be served, and to fight the fights that matter most.

This is the future we need: leaders that can’t be silenced, organizations that can’t be starved out, and boards that won’t compromise on justice.

The world doesn’t need more nonprofits surviving on life support. It needs movements with muscle, missions with money, and leaders who refuse to play small. 

It’s time to break your chains — fund it yourself.  “Not because it is easy, but because it is necessary, not because victory is guaranteed, but because the fight is worth it.”

Maria Rio

Maria Rio

As the founder of Further Together, Maria Rio (she/her) uses her lived experience and 10+ years of fundraising to tackle inequity in the nonprofit sector. She is a trusted nonprofit consultant, sought-after speaker, and the host of The Small Nonprofit podcast. When she’s not supporting visionary leaders, she’s advocating for policy changes that eliminate poverty and food insecurity. You can connect with Maria on LinkedIn, sign up for her newsletter, or tune in to The Small Nonprofit.

Anger is beautiful. Anger is generative. Anger is ancestral.

Anger is beautiful. Anger is generative. Anger is ancestral.

By Chantelle Ohrling, a justifiably angry defender of Turtle Island

Righteous rage is not simply anger; it is love in its fiercest form, the refusal to let oppression go unanswered.

Anger is beautiful. Anger is generative. Anger is ancestral.

I offer these definitions to contrast with the definitions that may be found in the colonizer’s dictionaries. 

Language is truly beautiful in that it is a tool and cultural archive to be shaped as best suits those who use it. Since so many of our languages have been taken from us and replaced with English, French, Spanish, it’s only fair that we be allowed to reshape and redefine the language we’re forced to use to suit our experiences and narratives. Recreate our destroyed cultural archives. Redefining language, spaces, relationships, emotions is a way of reclaiming our power. 

Righteous Rage is a moral anger that is sparked in response to injustice against inherent human rights. From systemic to interpersonal, this anger fuels appropriate reaction which builds and heals. 

Righteous rage is the sacred, ancestral fury that knows injustice is not meant to be swallowed but spoken, screamed, sung into being. It is the riot which brings freedom from slavery, fuels the gay-liberation movement, and keeps land and water defenders rallying in the face of police brutality. 

Righteous rage is not simply anger; it is love in its fiercest form, the refusal to let oppression go unanswered.

Generative Spite is the opposite of vindictive destructiveness, which seeks “petty ill will or hatred with the disposition to irritate, annoy, or thwart.” 

Generative spite is the alchemy of pain into purpose and the sharpening of defiance into a tool of creation. Generative spite takes every interpersonal insult and doubt, every system that says “you cannot,” and transforms them into a living testament of “I could and did.” 

It is within the poet who was told they would never be heard and now their words echo through generations. Generative spite creates without permission; it crafts, it grows, it persists out of sheer defiance. 

Anger is beautiful.

Anger is beautiful. I know because it’s shaped my bones and imbued my marrow with grace and strength. 

One of the earliest acts of resistance in the “so-called New World” was the burning of La Isabela, Cristoforo Colombo’s first settlement. Five hundred and thirty-three years ago, my ancestors set a blaze whose embers have never gone out – a fire kindled by defiance, flickering and dancing in the face of colonial violence, burning through the genes of every generation since. I carry it still, an inherited rage shaping my bones into fortresses of resilience. Anger fed my ancestors, sustained my people, and carved a path through the smoke of dispossession. I am alive today thanks to my ancestors who spited colonialism with their lives. 

Anger is a tool of survival. Anger is an act of love. 

Audre Lorde reminds us: “Anger, used, does not destroy. Hatred does.” Hatred is the colonizer’s weapon – greedy, consuming, and bottomless. It alchemizes life into death, land into profit, community into ruin. Tar sands, pipelines, poisoned rivers – these are the malignant tumors of hatred metastasized into the land itself. 

Hatred swells alongside profit margins, feeding on itself while devouring everything in its path. The colonizer’s appetite is insatiable.

But anger – anger is sacred. Anger is venerated combustion.

Maya Angelou, in a 2014 interview said, “If you’re not angry, you’re either a stone or you’re too sick to be angry.” And yet, she cautioned, “Bitterness is like cancer. It eats upon the host. It doesn’t do anything to the object of its displeasure.” So we must use our anger. Paint it. Write it. March it. Sing it. Spit it into the face of oppression until it buckles under our relentless flame.

Anger is generative.

Anger is generative. In response to being told about my appointment to a board, a manager I looked up to asked “Are you sure you’ll be able to handle that?” That particular patronization joined the long list of microaggressions which gently and lovingly fan my flames to this day. Since joining that board I’ve completely redone their communications, increased readership, and have advanced DEI initiatives. That was my revenge: not bitterness, but transformation. Now I sit on multiple boards and teach others how to practice inclusivity. 

Yes, I handled that. 

Generative spite has fueled local activist and award-winning poet Wayde Compton, who stood at countless city council meetings demanding the truth about the Black community of Hogan’s Alley – a history deliberately hidden. He spoke again and again until acknowledgment birthed action. First, Hogan’s Alley Memorial Project came together, and then small acknowledgments from the city. 

Now, Hogan’s Alley Society has a community-based land trust in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, social housing, and sits on the precipice of a bright sunrise for Black community in Vancouver. 

Righteous anger fuels Nneka Allen, Múthoní Karíukí, and Mide Akerewusi as they continue to shape the industry into a more equitable space for Black fundraisers and Black organisations. When Nneka triggered public disclosure about the racism she, Múthoní, Mide and others experienced while on the board of the AFP Greater Toronto, they and their co-conspirators spoke truth to power and cultivated a community that thrives. 

Today, the Black Canadian Fundraisers Collective, co-founded by Black fundraisers including Nneka and Múthoní, supports a national membership of empowerment and thought leadership. Nneka Allen, Camila Vital Nunes Pereira and Nicole Salmon co-edited the book Collecting Courage, which is taught internationally, and with partner organisations, the Collective has designed and is delivering a capacity development academy to support Black-led, Black-serving, Black-focused organisations and Black fundraisers. 

After the entire AFP Greater Toronto board resigned, Mide stepped in as interim Chapter President and put together an interim board focused on equitable rebuilding. His immense work fueled by righteous anger has built the foundation of a new future for the chapter – one where every member truly belongs. 

When Arturo Alfonso Schomburg, an Afro-Puerto Rican activist, was a child he was told by a teacher that Black people had no “history, heroes, or accomplishments.” He spent the rest of his life collecting that history, and his personal library of over 4,000 books was the beginning of the The Schomburg Collection of Negro Literature and Art collection of the New York Public Library (now known as the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture). 

And when Kendrick Lamar called out colonialism by name and won five Grammys for doing so, that spite was polished into art – a diss track turned into cultural triumph. 

Spite is generative. Spite builds.

Sarah Deer, in “Rage, Indigenous Feminisms, and the Politics of Survival,” writes: “The turning point for me was when I was able to politicize my rage. As a student, I found great comfort in Audre Lorde’s 1981 essay ‘The Uses of Anger.’ I began to explore rage as a cogent response to injustice. I became a volunteer advocate for sexual assault survivors. My mental health drastically improved. My next challenge was to act upon rage in a productive way. I decided to go to law school.” 

Kateri Akiwenzie-Damm in a 2022 CBC interview says, “Righteous anger can fuel so much of our work – not only as writers, but as activists and cultural workers. We can use that energy to create beautiful things, to advance ourselves, our communities, and our families.” Her words are a hymn, a reminder that our anger is not only justified – it is generative.

Just as with the activists and authors above, anger as a healing balm was my reaction to experiencing violence as well. The first fundraising event I planned was months after leaving an abusive relationship for the last time. I began to read Black and Indigenous feminists en masse, and eventually propelled myself to university and into a career of healing on the fuel of justified rage – the rage of having tasted injustice and wanting better for future generations. 

Anger is a powerful, sacred tool. I’m sure that there are many more such stories, and that you have many of your own. 

Anger is ancestral.

Love begets anger in the face of injustice. Angry tears running down our faces water new hope in the scorched remains of colonialism.

Anger is ancestral. Our ancestors knew this sacred alchemy. There are many examples of rage and spite being used to eradicate hate and equitably rebuild. It’s a long lasting tradition on Turtle Island since those first flames set by my Taino ancestors. 

Over time it has helped Black people free themselves from their enslavers, Indigenous Peoples protect land, water, and their rights, and inspired gender expansive folks to pick up and let loose bricks in protest. 

Bountiful spite is focused and singular, though its fruit may be myriad and wide reaching. Its focus is on establishing in the face of destruction, not destruction itself. Authentic anger clarifies and offers determination. 

It is a prescriptive burning which brings healing.

On Turtle Island, Indigenous peoples have always understood the generative power of fire. Controlled burning nurtures the land, clears the way for planting, and regenerates ecosystems. Sometimes destruction is necessary for growth. Sometimes rage is necessary for justice. Righteous anger clears the rot, leaving fertile ground for new life to rise. 

In her powerful critical essay, “Refusal to forgive: Indigenous women’s love and rage,” Rachel Flowers writes, “I hope to reclaim space for Indigenous women’s rage, orienting it around a refusal to forgive, as informing an anticolonial approach to disrupting forms of violence and domination that reify settler colonialism.

“When the dehumanization of all Indigenous peoples is accepted as normal, especially aimed at the minds and bodies of Indigenous women through continued land dispossession and violence, it is unrealistic for settler society to expect us to forgive let alone love. In those moments when we come  together in protest or in remembrance for our sisters (and brothers and non-binary relations) our anger is not abandoned, our resentment is not relinquished; it is because of our profound love for one another.”

Countless stories of indignation throughout history show that anger is a tool of alchemization turning injustice to justice. It’s not enough to stop the flow of hatred and divest from their power; we must build the new and invest in the power of our communities. To get through the never-ending arduous work ahead of us, we must hold on to our pure rage which burns steadily deep in the very structure of our DNA like a coal mine fire. 

Our anger is the spark of revolution. 

When we freed ourselves of slavery, it was out of love for ourselves and our kin. When we take to the streets in protest of police brutality and for Palestine, it is an action of love for the oppressed. Love begets anger in the face of injustice. Angry tears running down our faces water new hope in the scorched remains of colonialism. 

Sarah Dear writes “I used to fear rage. Like many survivors of sexual violence, I spent endless nights trying to physically suppress feelings of rage, desperately hoping that, if I fought hard enough, my corporal body would somehow dissolve my fury. Over the years, I came to understand that this is an exercise in futility. Suppression of rage only caused more problems, emerging as self-hatred with its sinister companion, self-harm. I was terrified of rage primarily because I could not predict what might happen if I expressed, released, or even thought about rage.”

The colonizer is the one that must and does fear our anger. 

They have pathologized it, criminalized it, demonized it. They call it animalistic, uncontrollable, uncivilized. They want us placid, our tongues bitten bloody, our fists unclenched. They have violently punished those who dare to express their anger. Because they know that anger is power. They know that swallowed anger becomes a roiling force banging against our ribs until it cannot be contained. Suppressing anger makes us sick. They know that anger, when unleashed, topples empires. That is why they created the trope of the “angry black woman” and we must reclaim her. 

The colonizer’s vehemence in suppressing our rage is the evidence we need to recover our anger as a powerful tool. 

Anger is love in action.

Anger is love in action. We must decolonize our relationship with anger. Reclaim our birthright. 

Audre Lorde taught us that anger is loaded with information and energy. When fueled by love –  love for ourselves, our people, our earth – anger burns clean, illuminating the path toward liberation. All revolutions have grown into raging flames lit from an angered spark at the oppressive conditions.

Anger has been good to me. It has been a guiding star and a fierce protector. It has picked me up off the floor and straightened my gaze. Anger is not just a fuel; it is hope made flesh. It is the opposite of apathy. It is the howl of ancestors lighting the way forward. It is your muscles unclenching as you scream, as you act, as you take back what was always yours. 

Our ancestors’ fires still burn. Let us carry their flames forward. Let us build in defiance of destruction. 

Let us rage as an act of love.

“In my Native Feminisms course, I spend time during the first class meeting to inform students that they will likely experience justified anger and rage during the course of the semester. Unlike the oft-maligned ‘trigger warning,’ I instead seek to empower students to consider how rage and anger can be intellectual tools for analyzing the contours of injustice. In short, I try to cultivate the classroom I never had – a place to examine the virtues of Indigenous rage.” (Deer, 2010) The way that Sarah Deer has familiarized herself with her anger, used it as fuel, and is now sharing those teachings offers us another way to reclaim our emotional birthright. 

We will continue to organize, collaborate, and demand more from those in power and from ourselves. We will double down in the collective strength of our communities, divest from harmful systems, and build new ones rooted in reciprocity and care. Continue shaping the present with our powerful narratives. 

Channel your righteous anger into never ending fuel for mutual aid, advocacy, and community-centered solutions. Kendrick Lamar reminds us spite can be sharpened into something powerful to win battles and claim victories. 

May our actions be bright with generative spite and light the way for generations to come.

Chantelle Ohrling

Chantelle Ohrling

Chantelle Ohrling (she/her), comes from a long line of rebellious Afro-Taíno women. When she isn’t nerding out about planned giving at Ecojustice or with her nose in a book, she’s appreciatively wandering the land of the Coast Salish, Musqueam, Shishalh, Squamish & Tsleil-Waututh Peoples. She honours her responsibilities to her communities by working for environmental protection, strengthening Black communities locally and internationally, and ceaselessly advocating for Indigenous Sovereignty. She believes we can alchemize oppressive systems ( much like fungi decompose dead matter) into fertile ground for new societies rooted in reciprocal relationships based on deep care and respect for all living relations. You can find her on LinkedIn